Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction without rapid maxillary expansion
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction without rapid maxillary expansion.
OBJECTIVE To determine potential differences in treatment efficiencies of face mask therapy without rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at different early dental stages. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-nine Class III children who were treated with a face mask without RME were divided into two groups according to their pretreatment dental stage. The primary dentition treatment group consisted of 26 su...
متن کاملMaxillary protraction after surgically assisted maxillary expansion
This case report describes the orthodontic treatment of a 32-year-old woman with a Class III malocclusion, whose chief compliant was her dentofacial esthetics. The pretreatment lateral cephalometric tracings showed the presence of a Class III dentoskeletal malocclusion with components of maxillary deficiency. After discussion with the patient, the treatment option included surgically assisted r...
متن کاملComparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
INTRODUCTION The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft-tissue effects of maxillary protraction with miniplates compared with conventional facemask therapy and an untreated Class III control group. METHODS Forty-five subjects who were in prepubertal or pubertal skeletal growth periods were included in the study and divided into 3 groups of...
متن کاملCephalometric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction.
A prospective clinical trial was conducted to determine the cephalometric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction. Twenty Southern Chinese patients (eight males and 12 females with a mean age of 8.4 +/- 1.8 years) with skeletal Class III malocclusions were treated consecutively with maxillary expansion and a protraction facemask. Growth adaptation of these patients wa...
متن کاملComparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.
OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the active treatment effects for maxillary advancement induced by bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) and the active treatment effects for face mask in association with rapid maxillary expansion (RME/FM). MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a study on consecutively treated patients. The changes in dentoskeletal cephalometric var...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Angle Orthodontist
سال: 2010
ISSN: 0003-3219,1945-7103
DOI: 10.2319/091609-521.1